2011-02-04

It Is Poison!

Har funderat på att starta en liten serie med saker som förgiftar samhället. Kommer fylla på med mer saker längre fram.


The School System - It Is Poison!



Mass education was designed to turn independent farmers into docile, passive tools of production. That was its primary purpose. And don't think people didn't know it. They knew it and they fought against it. There was a lot of resistance to mass education for exactly that reason. It was also understood by the elites. Emerson once said something about how we're educating them to keep them from our throats. If you don't educate them, what we call "education," they're going to take control -- "they" being what Alexander Hamilton called the "great beast," namely the people. The anti-democratic thrust of opinion in what are called democratic societies is really ferocious. And for good reason. Because the freer the society gets, the more dangerous the great beast becomes and the more you have to be careful to cage it somehow.

- Noam Chomsky

Because they don't teach the truth about the world, schools have to rely on beating students over the head with propaganda about democracy. If schools were, in reality, democratic, there would be no need to bombard students with platitudes about democracy. They would simply act and behave democratically, and we know this does not happen. The more there is a need to talk about the ideals of democracy, the less democratic the system usually is.

- Noam Chomsky



Children at school learn the “rules” of good behaviour, i.e. the attitude that should be observed by every agent in the division of labour, according to the job he is “destined” for: rules of morality, civic and professional conscience, which actually means rules of respect for the socio-technical division of labour and ultimately the rules of the order established by class domination. They also learn to speak properly, to “handle” the workers correctly, i.e. actually (for the future capitalists and their servants) to order them about properly. To put this scientifically, I shall say that the reproduction of labour power requires not only a reproduction of its skills, but also, at the same time, a reproduction of its submission to the rules of the established order, i.e. a reproduction of submission to the ruling ideology for the workers, and a reproduction of the ability to manipulate the ruling ideology correctly for the agents of exploitation and repression, so that they, too, will provide for the domination of the ruling class “in words".

- Louis Althusser


The Fashion Industry - It Is Poison!



Through the organization of our daily lives, our bodies are trained, shaped, and impressed with the stamp of prevailing historical forms of selfhood, desire, masculinity, femininity. Such an emphasis casts a dark and disquieting shadow across the contemporary scene. For women, as study after study shows, are spending more time on the management and discipline of our bodies than we have in a long, long time. In a decade marked by a reopening of the public arena to women, the intensification of such regimens appears diversionary and subverting. Through the pursuit of an ever-changing, homogenizing, elusive ideal of femininity - a pursuit without a terminus, requiring that women constantly attend a minute and often whimsical changes in fashion – female bodies become docile bodies – bodies whose forces and energies are habituated to external regulation, subjection, transformation, “improvement”. Through the exacting and normalizing disciplines of diet, makeup, and dress – central organizing principles of time and space in the day of women – we are rendered less socially oriented and more centripetally focused on self-modification. Through these disciplines, we continue to memorize on our bodies the feel and conviction of lack, of insufficiency, of never being good enough. At the farthest extremes, the practices of femininity may lead us to utter demoralization, debilitation, and death.

- Susan Bordo



Viewed historically, the discipline and normalization of the female body – perhaps the only gender oppression that exercises itself, although to different degrees and in different forms, across age, race, class, and sexual orientation – has to be acknowledged as an amazingly durable and flexible strategy of social control. In our own era, it is difficult to avoid the recognition that the contemporary preoccupation with appearance, which still affects women far more powerfully than men, even in our narcissistic and visually oriented culture, may function as a backlash phenomenon, reasserting existing gender configurations against any attempts to shift or transform power relations.

- Susan Bordo - From Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

detta gillar jag! snälla gör en liten serie av det för jag har zoonat på nåt liknande fast mer på skoj, men ändå inte. elias dropppade nåt sist vi talades vid om att vi "borde jobba aktivt för att krossa babylon". halvt/mest skämt från hans sida men fick idém om att göra en ny blogg alternativt köra ett återkommande moment här med skojiga/seriösa tips på hur man kan "krossa babylon"... så detta du kör här e ju perfekt! props!

ska fö kolla in docsen här under, verkar nice... e mkt zoon nu på just det där med att inte "passa in" så att säga då det jag pluggar e hälften sociologi med mkt fokus på just sådant, som bryter ner det till det nitty gritty and so on.. mao diggas det som fan. ja, typ nåt... haha ska iaf lägga till detta inlägget på bgm-skolan imorn! pz len, keep up the good work!

//G

Anonymous said...

Fixade att lägga upp de som femte lektionen själv :).

Ja det är bud på att försöka komma med mer seriösa grejer. Börjar äcklas mer och mer av Babylon.

Angående dokumentärerna så är dem riktiga jävla guldkorn för dig om du läser sådant om att inte passa in nu. Hade gärna sett filmerna igen efter att ha läst de du har läst. Vad läser du nu? Massa tunga grejer?

BB

Anonymous said...

huvudkursen e ju socialpsykologi a, vilket ska/kommer vara mkt fokus på gruppbeteende och ja, "social interaktion" liksom.. å sen läser vi två av de fyra delkurserna ihop med folk som läser sociologi a. och introduktionskursen nu är en sån gemensam.

men en bok som vi hade seminarie på igår och som kommer på tentan som var extremt jobbig att läsa (vart tredje ord var typ latin, sjuk pretentiösa författare) men samtidigt jävligt intressant. den bryter liksom ner så mkt det går hur allt socialt liv uppstår och ständigt pågår, om hur vi själva skapar hela vår sociala värld och själva upprätthåller alla (vidriga) mönster inom den osv osv. och därmed också allt med regler för hur man får vara, får tycka, hur man utesluts om man är/tycker på ett visst sätt osv. typ sociala samhällets diverse försvarsmekanismer. som vi mer eller mindre omedvetet hjälper till med pga av hela inskolningen till livet liksom, massa mög haha men kul!

tror iaf det kommre bli jävligt bra, har redan vatt inne och diskuterats om michel foucault (stavning?) som du nämnt här innan ju, samt marx och massa andra intressanta samhällsfilosofer.

tror iaf den kommer ge en en hel del så det e nice, för det e ett sätt att krossa babylon.. om du ska plugga, plugga nåt som DU vinner på/växer av och inte bara för att få ett jobb (iofs tror jag denna inriktningen kan va nåt för mig, så detta kanske blir början på jobb-plugg ändå haha, men iaf en kombo då!)

håller på å tankar crumb nu så ska försöka se den snarast! :)

/GUTEFÅRET